Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Aggro | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
| Azorius Flash | levunga21 | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Affinity , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Cage , Azorius Convoke , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Midrange , Azorius Tokens Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Spyglass Siren ranks #72 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 18%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 72.0%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Spyglass Siren is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 36.86 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.0%. Spyglass Siren has a win rate of 73.1%, making it 3.9% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 10 | 82.1% | 5 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 5 | 81.4% | 3 |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 11 | 78.7% | 5 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 11 | 76.4% | 4 |
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 31 | 75.8% | 11 |
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 25 | 75.6% | 15 |
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 8 | 71.6% | 2 |
| Norn's Inquisitor | Creature — Phyrexian Knight | 5 | 70.0% | 3 |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 9 | 69.6% | 2 |
| Assimilation Aegis | Artifact — Equipment | 12 | 69.4% | 5 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Spyglass Siren than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inti, Seneschal of the Sun | Legendary Creature — Human Knight | 2 | 12 | 82.1% | 74.5% | +7.5% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 6 | 80.6% | 73.1% | +7.4% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 5 | 78.6% | 72.0% | +6.5% |
| Recommission | Sorcery | 2 | 13 | 80.8% | 74.4% | +6.4% |
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 3 | 10 | 80.7% | 74.8% | +5.9% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 13 | 76.6% | 71.9% | +4.7% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 30 | 78.0% | 73.3% | +4.6% |
| Into the Flood Maw | Instant | 1 | 6 | 79.4% | 75.7% | +3.7% |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 1 | 11 | 79.7% | 76.2% | +3.4% |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 2 | 11 | 76.7% | 73.5% | +3.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 1951 | 94.2% | 51.2% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 545 | 98.0% | 48.5% |
| Dimir Bounce | 440 | 89.1% | 50.4% |
| Azorius Flash | 222 | 98.2% | 58.7% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 199 | 67.9% | 50.6% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.